Archive

Archive for March, 2009

GM, President Obama & Fascism

March 30th, 2009

Michael Ledeen wrote an interesting article “We are all Fascists Now” when Newsweek declared We Are All Socialists Now”

The next 2 parts of a great video series lay out what is happening right now!

Since President Obama demanded that GM’s CEO, Rick Wagoner resign how is it a free-market now?

Can political favor be purchased for market gains and means?

Is the President of the United States now the de-facto Chairman of the Board of GM?

Hand-waving and political gamesmanship won’t do, because it is part of the process.

Fascism – we’re already there.

BTW – Obama’s fascist popularity is not centered around nationalistic war, but cultural war. I’m certain similarities to other fascist leaders will easily be found if one is willing to look.

Political , , ,

The American Form of Government

March 17th, 2009

It took me a while to track down the origin of this video, which was seen all over the Internet. It was produced by the John Birch Society, and John McManus, their president, narrated the video.

Actually this is Part 2 of a 4 part series. The whole thing can also be ordered on DVD.

Political , ,

Sacrificial Love

March 17th, 2009

Fr. Pavone has an excellent observation about love and the sacrifices one makes.

Human Rights , ,

“Fertilized Eggs” vs Zygotic Human Embryos

March 12th, 2009

Is it okay to use the term “fertilized egg”?

Not if you’re referring to human beings after conception.

The problem lies in how the words are used. Fertilization is an initiating process – a verb. With humans, it is not an end state of that process. People are born – not hatched, so the gestational environment (egg) that avians require is not the same needed by mammals*. If a human egg (oocyte) is fertilized (undergoes that process) it is no longer an egg. It is transformed. It changes its state of being.

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (HESCR) and abortion proponents play word games, using a valid phrase “fertilized egg”, but fallaciously redefine the meaning to a thing which exists after the process is finished. It’s only valid to say it’s a “fertilized egg” between the time the zona pellucida has been penetrated until amphimixis is complete – at which point you have a zygote – a one cell human being. The actually process of fertilization is no longer occurring to an egg – which has been transformed.

Here’s an illustration to clarify:

Someone is holding a glass of water. We could say – that’s a melted ice-cube, and understand that at some point prior to our immediate observation an ice-cube as an object was in the glass.

But would we talk about drinking a melted ice-cube as though the cube still existed?

Now we’re going to extract a few drops from this “melted ice-cube”. Where’s the ice-cube? It’s not an ice-cube anymore. The ice-cube has ceased to be.

Now let’s take our illustration one step further. Suppose while holding the glass of “melted ice-cube”, the “melted ice-cube” started to grow, filling up the glass on it’s own. Where’s the ice-cube now?

Melting is a process that transforms the state of water from a solid to a liquid. At the end of melting, there is no identifiable object “ice-cube”. We can only understand it as having existed at the time of the transformation, but not after.

The same thing applies to eggs and fertilization. Human eggs are not self governing “growing” organisms – but that describes living human beings.

The Endowment for Human Development (EHD) appears to have solid neutral information on human development and the zygote.

The next time someone refers to a “fertilized egg” ask them a simple question: “Do you mean after conception – when the pronuclei have fused?” (Or you could ask them if they were hatched…)

It might lead to a discussion about when we become human beings.

Note: When writing this post I was quite surprised at how many professional organizations used the term “fertilized egg” when referring to a human zygote. Would they be upset if others called them “fertilized eggs”?

*Okay – so the platypus is a mammal that lays eggs. Humans are not platypus.

Related Posts:
Common Evidence – What is it?

Human Rights , , ,

HESCR “expert” Bill Clinton scrambles eggs

March 12th, 2009

Bill Clinton’s appearance on Larry King Live last night with Dr. Sanjay Gupta has set off a spate of fertilized embryo blog posts that wonder what he was saying.

There’s a great deal of confusion out there, so to make it clear:

After conception, there is no such thing as a “fertilized egg”.

Don’t pay attention to on-line or recent dictionaries either, they’ve all been polluted.

The oocyte (egg) ceases to exist, once amphimixis (the DNA blending) is complete. In fact the moment the zona pellucida is penetrated major reactions occur, which transform both the egg and sperm.

When the transformation is finished, there is no longer a sperm cell or an egg cell. Two individual cells have become one. It is a zygote – a single cell human being.

Robert P. George lays it out clearly in his book with Christopher Tollefsen: Embryo: A Defense of Human Life

George goes through the whole process and backs it with medical and scientific references.

We lose when we continually refer to such a thing as a “fertilized egg” because that deceptively masks over what the zygote really is – a formed, existing human being at the most primary stage of life.

It also glosses over the amazing fact that the conception process is a unique, life-giving event for individual human beings and provides the flesh & blood basis for all human rights.

Related Posts:
“Fertilized Eggs” vs Zygotic Human Embryos

Human Rights , , , ,

Burning of HMS Gaspee – Inspired Boston Tea Party – a true story

March 3rd, 2009
Comments Off
Brownell-Burning of the GaspeeThe Bostonians were late to the party – in 1772 Rhode Islanders decided upon a more radical protest of taxation: they burned the HMS Gaspee, a royal revenue cutter, to the waterline.
Not sure what the equivalent would look like today, but clearly the whole taxation thing, along with the President’s calls for us to invest in the market (?!!) could fan some dissenting flames.

Remember – if you’re going to make tea, you have to heat the water first.

Political , ,

Pro-Life Categories – a framework

March 3rd, 2009

I’m trying to determine the lowest number of categories one could reasonably identify most pro-life efforts/groups. The determining factor is by function – the primary function performed by the group.

Here’s the list of categories:

  1. Actions: events/activities. March for Life, 40 Days for Life, Right to Life, Priests for Life.
  2. Journalism: investigative journalism/reporting. LiveAction.
  3. Newsfeeds/distribution: News monitoring, consolidation. LifeSite, LifeNews.
  4. Education/Training: Bio-ethics, lifestyle, media. STR, LTI, FamilyLife, FoF, churches.
  5. Direct Support: outreach/healing support ministries. HBI, CareNet, Rachel’s Vineyard, StandupGirl.
  6. Testimony: public human interest/evidence impact. Operation OutCry, Silent No More.
  7. Arts: expressive/artistic media efforts. Bella, Volition, etc.

Some organizations overlap and provide multiple services. Some are difficult to identify as clearly belonging in one group or the other.

Are there any categories that are missing?  Are there any groups that would break this categorization?  Thoughts, comments?  (Thanks!)

Human Rights ,