bioSLED | ThruFire

October 7, 2012
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Can you be a Christian and be pro-choice?

Can you be a Christian and be pro-choice?

It is impossible for someone to be pro-abortion-choice and an observant follower of Christ. Now I’m not claiming it doesn’t happen, or the one making that claim is lost, unsaved etc. I’m claiming that being an observant follower of Christ is mutually exclusive from demanding bodily autonomy for one’s self or others. Abortion places the desires of the flesh over the love of God. 1 Cor 6:19-20 makes it abundantly clear that our bodies are not ours! Continue reading →

March 13, 2010
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on BioSLED – Bodily-autonomy Abortion Absurdity

BioSLED – Bodily-autonomy Abortion Absurdity

If time is irrelevant to the abortion argument, both humans would have the same rights. So if mother and daughter swapped places (putting the mother into her daughter’s womb), then the daughter would have the right to abort her mother. (?!) Continue reading →

August 18, 2009
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on BioSLED – essential pro-life position

BioSLED – essential pro-life position

This is the best rational argument against abortion in it’s most basic form. As a culture, we uphold the just, moral principle that innocent human beings ought not be intentionally killed. (“ought” is legal for “any, at all, under all … Continue reading →

May 19, 2009
by Chris Arsenault
3 Comments

BioSLED – Handling Bodily Autonomy Abortion Arguments

There are no exceptions for violence against dependent human beings. If someone genuinely believes in the goodness of humanity and self-autonomy, when they resort to violence to benefit themselves, they cruely victimize others, and also themselves by desecrating their own humanity. Continue reading →

May 13, 2009
by Chris Arsenault
5 Comments

BioSLED – Handling Non-personhood Abortion Arguments

Self-awareness doesn’t require communicating your own awareness to others. Yet body presence indicates you exist – your body is your means of communication. A test for intangible personhood which ignores the human body is an invalid test, because no natural human being can pass it. Continue reading →

May 12, 2009
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Choice?

Choice?

Squiggling in the word “choice” allows people a conscientious backdoor to escape. When someone says “choice” they need to be asked – what is the result of an abortion-choice? Because the only factual answer is: a dead human being. And … Continue reading →

February 11, 2009
by Chris Arsenault
12 Comments

BioSLED – best argument against abortion-choice

If we do not morally discriminate against human beings outside the womb with these attributes (we treat them equally as humans under the law) then such conclusions also apply to pre-born human beings because:

Continue reading →

April 3, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
1 Comment

Lileigh’s Location 1 (Bodily Autonomy & Rights)

Refuting Thomson’s Violinist Argument (AKA Parasite Pregnancies) Lileigh Lehnen was an 8-1/2 month developed unborn child who suffered an injury prior to birth, was born via c-section, then died. Technically, the judge ruled her death a non-homocide because she wasn’t … Continue reading →

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	31

ThruFire

Burning off the dross

Tag Archives: bioSLED