ThruFire

Burning off the dross

December 29, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Proverbs 16:1,3,9 Planning

Proverbs 16:1,3,9 Planning

Downtime between holidays means few interruptions – a great time to review the passing year and plan the upcoming year with my family. See if we can’t all get on the same page.  Blogging, commenting and updating will be light this week.

December 28, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Still setting up shop

Still setting up shop

After transitioning to WordPress, I’m playing catch-up with plugin/widgets etc. Recent upgrade to WP 2.7 is very nice.

December 25, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas!

Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord. This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.”  

[NIV: Luke 2:10-12]

Lord – May all who read these words of Good News find that Great Joy.

December 24, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Tweeting & Creativity

Tweeting & Creativity

Okay – so I succumbed and joined twitter last evening – it’s easy to see N-connections across the web, and for twitter following it’s completely unclear why they’re connected, other than someone traversing a pool (node) of followers and deciding to follow someone at random.

It’s way early – (3:00 AM) and I woke up wondering how you connect 6 billion people on all levels.

It must’ve been something I drank – take a look.

BTW – I got there, by way of Michael Hyatt to Sara Horn and then her web developer – PulsePoint Design – Kelli Standish.

How did I know Michael Hyatt? He’s the head of Thomas Nelson publishers who published Dawn Eden’s book – Thrill of the Chaste.  I had been following Michael’s blog sporadically and remembered he had mentioned something about twitter.

Where I started I had no idea I would end up coming across stuff like this!

Geek icon spotting – came across Joi Ito and Susan Kare.

I’ve got to get some sleep.

December 21, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Chanukah Confrontations

Chanukah Confrontations

Chanukah begins tonight, and I wish all my Jewish friends Happy Chanukah!

Several years ago, I had a little exchange with the Velveteen Rabbi.  Obviously our world-views clashed, (she’s socially liberal, I’m conservative… etc.) but it lead to some very interesting insights, which I share below. Please let me know what you think.


As Chanukah approached, I was preparing a Bible study lesson for a Messianic study group, consisting of Jewish and Gentile believers, to deliver on the first night of Chanukah. The focus was – should believers celebrate Chanukah?  If so, what was the significance of the holiday?

Previously, I read of the possibility of Jesus conception/Incarnation occurring at the time of Chanukah, with his birth occuring during the following Feast of Sukkot.  But the first Chanukah was a delayed Sukkot because of the war, and after prayerfully considering it, I decided this wasn’t a direction I wanted to go.  The idea of ‘when’ wasn’t as important as the fact that God was among us – Emmanuel. The Incarnation was most important.

Christians celebrating Chanukah might reignite feelings of assimilation among Jews – indeed Chanukah in part, was a celebration of the rejection of the Greek conquerors. So there’s this clash/confrontation that’s always present, and it struck me as strangely repetitive.

In leading a Bible study, my greatest desire is to remain true to God. Any exploration needed to be grounded on accepted Scripture, otherwise I could become doctrinally untethered as I believed had happened to the Pharisees. It was a struggle to come up with the lesson.

Chanukah is actually mentioned in the New Testament: John 10:22.  Here the theme of being a light in the darkness pits the beliefs of the Jewish leaders against their own Scriptures, and the promise of Messiah.  In other words, the Jewish leaders went further than just rejecting the outward trappings of Hellenization, they also insulated themselves from considering the possibility that God may appear to them outside of their expectations. They simply didn’t understand the Incarnation. And this too struck me as strangely repetitive – but still I was unable to put my finger on it, it was though I was in a cloud.

The time came for the Bible study and all I had was an unfinished lesson. I simply trusted God with the outcome, knowing He might have different plans. 

When the Chanukiah was lit before the study it felt wrong, but I still couldn’t say why. In preparation, the Holy Spirit had prompted me with a couple of references to the shekinah cloud. (Exodus 19:9-24, 1 Kings 8:12).  I compared the cloud – Shekinah, with Y’shua. The shekinah cloud believed to be the presence of God, yet Y’shua was rejected for being a ‘mere man’ – what were they expecting as the Messiah?

The lesson wasn’t particularly clear about the relationship between the shekinah and Chanukah. Before going to sleep that night, I reread John 10:22-38 once more. In the morning, it was clear: the shekinah cloud shielded the light, for when the cloud descended on the Tabernacle and Temple, no one could explain what was inside. The light inside wasn’t ready to be shown fully to the world at that time. (Looking at the cloud doesn’t really tell us the source, and without entering it we’re unlikely to come face to face with His Presence.) You must have faith.

The pillar of fire – that was another matter – it was the light that shone above all of Israel, in the darkness of an escape from captivity.

Light and the source of that light was exactly what the Feast of Dedication was all about.

The Jewish leaders ask Y’shua – “Are you Messiah?”

He had already told them at the Feast of Tabernacles (John 8:12).

The Jewish leaders seem sincere, but also guarded – there is a dark cloud of mystery around Y’shua. They don’t know, but are unwilling to really investigate His claims. They will not enter.

He gives them another chance. Look, seek, believe me by reading the Scriptures. But they don’t go read. They have no faith that the Holy Scriptures will explain who is before them, yet they embrace the authority of the Scriptures for their own purposes.

Y’shua is pleading for them to open their eyes.  Even though they are like sheep, a reference to David, to Scripture (Psalm 23!), to Messiah. No one can snatch them from my hand should have immediately brought to mind Deuteronomy 31:8 – walking into that valley of the shadow of death. Jesus claims he is God.

They wish to stone him, thinking he is committing blasphemy, claiming deity.

He tells them – If the Scriptures cannot be broken – (and you use them as the basis of your authority) and even in your sinful state, you are called ‘sons of God’ (Psalm 82), how can you reject my saying I am the Son of God (2 Samuel 7:11-16)?

In the season of light, they meet the Light of the World, Y’shua, Messiah, and reject him, convinced that their light – their understanding, is sufficient.  But Y’shua doesn’t give up on them. He provides another chance, another way of thinking about it – “If you don’t believe in me, at least believe in the miracles I have done.” Surely, in this season of celebrating miracles, the miracles speak of who He is, what God is doing.

No – they reject him again.

Can you see what is happening? Every year we have Chanukah and Christmas coinciding. The Incarnation vs the Rabbis.  Every year, this passage is re-enacted.

The death and bloodshed of the cross have hidden God’s presence like a dark cloud for many, but has become a beacon of light and hope for others. Just like the shekinah, the Incarnation – Jesus Christ is the manifestation of God on earth.

There are those who believe in the “miracle of the oil”, but do not believe in the miracles that Y’shua, Jesus, the Light of the World, Messiah brings to the earth. The healing of millions. The tikkun ‘olam. Who can deny this?

I’m reluctant to celebrate Chanukah in the rabbinical sense, because it means the miracle of the oil is more important than the miracle of healed lives through Christ, which isn’t true.  Who provided the sacred oil is more important than the oil. Rededication of a temple building is less important than dedicating the temple of your body to God.  
 
A candle cannot be lit without the flame being ignited.  We cannot be godly without the Spirit of God.

Jesus, the “Light of the World”, is the everlasting shamash, the servant that would spread light to the whole world.

And God lit up the world through Christ – Read Acts 2.

So I celebrate Chanukah whenever I share that Light with others, and they too accept the Light of the World.

December 14, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
1 Comment

Common Evidence – “What is it?”

Jasper’s comment at Jill Stanek’s over Ilana Goldman’s refusal to answer Bob Enyarts question “What is it?” happened to coincide with an existing unpublished post of mine.

While reading through Robert P. George and Christopher Tollefsen’s book Embryo:A Defense of Human Life, it occurred to me so few people who argue in the abortion debates, both pro-life and abortion-choice, really understand the scientific basis for life. The biological depth is astounding, and invites a serious philosophical debate. The authors are disturbed by the diminishing level of discourse – where rationality regarding the evidence is being plainly and willfully ignored. (Ilana Goldman illustrates this irrationality so well.)

They point out various activities within the first 14 days after conception are not so easily explained. The possibilities of intercellular communication seem to be a fascinating area of biochemical research. There is sensing occurring, at a level we don’t yet comprehend. (If you think intercellular communication is not possible – you need to check out how single cell bacteria communicate.)

Some abortion-choice advocates call embryos non-sentient tissue, but their arguments are – subjective:

All human beings with rights are sentient; No embryo is sentient; therefore no embryo is a human being with rights.

If the argument is over living flesh and blood, and “what it is”, then sapience is a pre-requisite to sentience, because it is impossible to have a subjective (sentient) homo-sapien, without first having an objective one. Self-awareness does not require communicating self-insight to others, so any perceived observation of another’s self-awareness is completely subjective. It is an imposition of an external idea of awareness upon another, completely impossible without the underlying matter – the flesh and blood.

Put another way – arguments over flesh and blood rights doesn’t work if their own flesh and blood, (including their sense of self-awareness) is removed. So another approach would have been to ask Ilana – “what are you?”

How can one demand rights while denying pre-requisites underlying their own sense of personhood?

It begs the question.

December 13, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Fruit of the Spirit – Gal 5:22

Fruit of the Spirit – Gal 5:22

Imagine if these were the laws to be followed:

  • Do not Love;
  • Joy is prohibited;
  • Peace is not allowed;
  • Kindness is forbidden;
  • Goodness is banished;
  • Faithfulness is to be forgotten;
  • Gentleness annihilated;
  • Self-control abolished;

So how often do we follow those, instead of the one who commanded:

love your neighbor as yourself?

December 12, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Culture war

Culture war

The culture war is a war against ignorance and insanity. Some gratefully label themselves ignorant while others repeatedly prove they are within their own moral universe through delusional denial and semantic sophistry, such as exhibited by Colmes and Obama. No matter how irrefutable the evidence of crimes against human beings, both pre-born and born, personal denial is always sought.

They escape into the darkness of their own souls, cowering from the truth.

The only correct response is to have compassion and mercy upon the living victims and even upon the criminals.

In a world where loving-kindness is rare, Christ had it right – love your enemies until the day they are judged by Him. May the Lord have mercy upon them in his wrath.

No matter how blind others are to the truth, we can never be blind to the injustices inflicted upon the innocent, nor stop our efforts to defend and protect them. So it rages on.

December 10, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Optimizing Coverage of March for Life

Optimizing Coverage of March for Life

Okay – I promised network specifics.

What do we need to do differently?

First visit Blogs4Life.

This interesting conference has a dual purpose – speakers covering the pro-life blogging topics in the morning – then covering the Annual March for Life in the afternoon.

That’s not instantly apparent. (I understand the site is still being developed.)

You’ll also find a long list of pro-life bloggers, yet how many are currently active, what’s their posting frequency? How many unique visitors do they have? To what extent do they cover certain aspects of the issues? Do we know who is covering what?

(Standardized life icons/badges indicating 7-8 categories would help) Visit a pro-life site, look for the badge-bar and you know what’s usually discussed, and by how much.

Any efficient graphic designer available for a worthy cause?

Which bloggers are best in conveying which aspect of the pro-life message?

For instance – I go to Dawn Eden for chastity issues, Jill Stanek for news coverage opinion, Secondhand Smoke for broad perspective,

How about tech savvy – do some understand scripting and code better than others? How many tool makers visit pro-life blogs, but don’t volunteer in this area?

Back to the long list of blogs: do they link to each other? If each blog is a node, what’s the relationship between the nodes? Are there a cluster of blogs that focus on one particular aspect of the message, as I just mentioned?

What’s the total number of active participants – both bloggers and subscribers out there?

Knowing the answer to that and drawing them together into a network would provide advertisers (and content creators) a potential market with a serious commitment to put their money where their heart is – into the pro-life cause.

Backgrounder – see this discussion about Creating the ThruFire Network.

December 8, 2008
by Chris Arsenault
Comments Off on Out with the trash

Out with the trash

Some people find this hilarious – others find it offensive.

First off – the commercial is not a brief offhand joke or cute play upon the idea – it’s a mini-movie, an advertising campaign with a specific objective: selling JC Penney product.

This is business, with cash and reputation behind it – not funny to JC Penney if their sales plummeted.

It trades excessively on the stereotypical viewpoint most men are clueless in expressing romantic gestures: men should just know and understand what their woman desires – what gift, should they decide to give one, will avoid banishment to the doghouse.

(In my experience – most women don’t even know what they want until after they receive the gift. So aren’t women equally senseless about expressing romantic gestures towards men? No way – men are simple – sex or sports.)

The commercial and site depicts women as materialistic, overbearing, domineering, demanding respect, love and affection, and to keep peace and gain “freedom” men need to use trivial trinkets: shiny stones and cold metal. LOL

In the commercial, he’s giving her an anniversary gift but notice – our society has moved the focus from the couple and marriage to all events being exclusively about her. This is about her and her control, as much as weddings and births are female focused and under her control. What about the marriage? Both the marriage and men are an afterthought. Pick up a Cosmo magazine lately? What about the Sex & The City franchise? – one of it’s creators, a gay man, said it’s about objectifying men as non-thinking, non-emoting sex objects. Women have a continual conversation about men, without actually conversing deeply and seriously with men. Little wonder we have a hookup culture.

Notice – this scorned anniversary wife is not alone in her distress – it places other women as a tribunal that judges men. You remember the scene – right?

So flip the genders – particularly with that scene. What’s the picture?

Three men on one side, and a single woman on the other, and the specific focus is on her incompetent performance.

Suffice it to say, it’s not nice.

While some think the commercial is creative, it depicts something closer to reality when men put women in the “doghouse”: prison.

(They put themselves into prison – just as it shows.)

Some see humor, but I see the effects from decades of disrespect of men.

When a man puts a woman in the doghouse, he avoids her – he passive-aggressively shuts her out. Men look at other women, view porn on the Internet, get adulterous, spend inordinate amounts of time watching sports, doing just about anything but actually sitting down and talking with the one they “love”. Women discuss their doghouse man with their friends, then go on to imagine other men are more clueful, and given enough time or opportunity become adulterous too. The entire soap show industry is built on that premise.

Men remain silent until anger and annoyance builds and boils. Most women don’t realize that the one thing men need most – respect, has been under constant attack for almost 40 years.

With Roe – men have been legally castrated during the first nine months of their children’s lives, with no decision making power, or role, other than sperm donation. What a huge disrespect to all men.

When a woman picks on a man, he’s in a no-win situation. Society has condoned this attack and this commercial is one more proof. In researching a book I was writing I came across this. It cuts a lot deeper than most women realize – so much so, most men refuse to even discuss it. It comes out in subtle boiling anger points, and violent lash outs. There’s an undercurrent of male anger out there far greater than many women realize.

Wrapping a commercial up in prison garb when it’s supposed to be about expressing devotion to someone we love isn’t funny – at all. Not funny for the women that suffer at the hands of men who are insecure, or for the men who believe they’ll find respect when they wield enough force to demand it, then end up in prison themselves.

In short – for men, this commercial says marriage is a prison.

Lastly, exploiting the negative aspects of relationships for commercial gains is pure poison.

Remember markets want to grow.